Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Cloud Tech ReportCloud Tech Report
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Cloud Tech ReportCloud Tech Report
    Home»AI News»Fine-Tuning Tool-Calling LLMs: A Complete Guide Using XYZ-Aquila-SFT and Qwen3
    AI News

    Fine-Tuning Tool-Calling LLMs: A Complete Guide Using XYZ-Aquila-SFT and Qwen3

    August 16, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Fine-Tuning Tool-Calling LLMs: A Complete Guide Using XYZ-Aquila-SFT and Qwen3
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email
    kraken


    In this tutorial, we implement an end-to-end supervised fine-tuning pipeline for the XYZ-Aquila-SFT dataset, Hugging Face Transformers, PyTorch, and PEFT. We stream and inspect the dataset, parse multi-turn tool-use trajectories, extract structured tool calls, analyze corpus characteristics, and preserve embedded reasoning and observation patterns. We then convert tool schemas between message-embedded and structured formats, render Qwen-compatible ChatML with assistant-only loss masking, prepare a custom PyTorch dataset and collator, and fine-tune Qwen3-0.6B with LoRA. Finally, we evaluate tool-call prediction before and after training and export both the transformed dataset and corpus statistics for further experimentation.

    import os, sys, subprocess
    CFG = dict(
    REPO = “XYZAILab/XYZ-Aquila-SFT”,
    LANG = “en”,
    N_STREAM = 400,
    N_EVAL = 40,
    MODEL_ID = “Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B”,
    MAX_SEQ_LEN = 2048,
    LENGTH_POLICY = “truncate”,
    RUN_TRAINING = True,
    MAX_STEPS = 30,
    GRAD_ACCUM = 8,
    LR = 1e-4,
    LORA_R = 16,
    RUN_EVAL = True,
    N_EVAL_PROBES = 24,
    OUT_DIR = “/content/aquila_out”,
    SEED = 0,
    )
    os.makedirs(CFG[“OUT_DIR”], exist_ok=True)
    def pip(*pkgs):
    subprocess.run([sys.executable, “-m”, “pip”, “install”, “-q”, “-U”, *pkgs], check=False)
    pip(“datasets>=3.0.0”, “transformers>=4.51.0”, “peft>=0.13.0”, “accelerate>=1.0.0”)
    import json, re, math, random, statistics as stats
    from collections import Counter, defaultdict
    from dataclasses import dataclass, field
    from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
    import torch
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    from datasets import load_dataset
    from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup
    random.seed(CFG[“SEED”]); torch.manual_seed(CFG[“SEED”])
    DEV = “cuda” if torch.cuda.is_available() else “cpu”
    BF16 = DEV == “cuda” and torch.cuda.is_bf16_supported()
    print(f”device={DEV} bf16={BF16} torch={torch.__version__}”)
    print(f”\n[1] streaming {CFG[‘REPO’]}:{CFG[‘LANG’]} …”)
    stream = load_dataset(CFG[“REPO”], CFG[“LANG”], split=”train”, streaming=True)
    RAW: List[Dict[str, Any]] = list(stream.take(CFG[“N_STREAM”]))
    print(f” pulled {len(RAW)} rows; keys = {list(RAW[0].keys())}”)
    _r = RAW[0]
    print(f” question[:110] : {_r[‘question’][:110]}…”)
    print(f” answer : {_r[‘answer’][:80]}”)
    print(f” number of tool calls : {_r[‘number of tool calls’]}”)
    print(f” trajectory len : {len(_r[‘trajectory’])} msgs”)
    print(f” role sequence (first8): {[m[‘role’] for m in _r[‘trajectory’][:8]]}”)

    We configure the dataset, model, training parameters, output directory, and reproducibility settings for the complete workflow. We install the required Hugging Face, PEFT, Accelerate, and PyTorch-related dependencies and detect whether a CUDA GPU and BF16 support are available. We then stream a limited number of XYZ-Aquila-SFT examples, inspect the dataset schema, and examine the structure of the first tool-use trajectory.

    TOOLS_BLOCK_RE = re.compile(r”<tools>\s*(.*?)\s*</tools>”, re.S)
    THINK_RE = re.compile(r”<think>(.*?)</think>”, re.S)
    TOOL_RESP_RE = re.compile(r”<tool_response>\s*(.*?)\s*</tool_response>”, re.S)
    TOOLS_HDR_RE = re.compile(r”\n\n# Tools\n\n”)
    def iter_json_objects(text: str, limit: int = 1):
    “””Nesting-safe JSON scanner. Regex like r’\\{.*?\\}’ breaks on nested
    `arguments` objects, which every real tool call has.”””
    dec, i, n, out = json.JSONDecoder(), 0, len(text), []
    while i < n and len(out) < limit:
    while i < n and text[i] not in “{[“:
    i += 1
    if i >= n:
    break
    try:
    obj, end = dec.raw_decode(text, i)
    except json.JSONDecodeError:
    i += 1
    continue
    out.append(obj); i = end
    return out
    def parse_tool_calls(content: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
    calls = []
    for m in re.finditer(r”<tool_call>”, content):
    got = iter_json_objects(content[m.end():], limit=1)
    if got:
    calls.append(got[0])
    return calls
    @dataclass
    class Trajectory:
    question: str
    answer: str
    declared_calls: int
    messages: List[Dict[str, str]]
    system_core: str = “”
    tools: List[Dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list)
    tools_suffix: str = “”
    calls: List[Dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list)
    n_observations: int = 0
    n_think: int = 0
    @property
    def tool_names(self): return [c.get(“name”, “?”) for c in self.calls]
    @property
    def depth(self): return len(self.messages)
    def parse_row(row: Dict[str, Any]) -> Trajectory:
    msgs = [{“role”: m[“role”], “content”: m[“content”]} for m in row[“trajectory”]]
    t = Trajectory(row[“question”], row[“answer”], row[“number of tool calls”], msgs)
    if msgs and msgs[0][“role”] == “system”:
    sysmsg = msgs[0][“content”]
    split = TOOLS_HDR_RE.search(sysmsg)
    if split:
    t.system_core = sysmsg[:split.start()]
    t.tools_suffix = sysmsg[split.start():]
    else:
    t.system_core = sysmsg
    blk = TOOLS_BLOCK_RE.search(sysmsg)
    if blk:
    t.tools = iter_json_objects(blk.group(1), limit=64)
    for m in msgs:
    if m[“role”] == “assistant”:
    t.calls += parse_tool_calls(m[“content”])
    t.n_think += len(THINK_RE.findall(m[“content”]))
    else:
    t.n_observations += len(TOOL_RESP_RE.findall(m[“content”]))
    return t
    TRAJ = [parse_row(r) for r in RAW]
    t0 = TRAJ[0]
    print(f”\n[2] parsed {len(TRAJ)} trajectories”)
    print(f” tool schemas found : {[fn.get(‘function’, fn).get(‘name’) for fn in t0.tools]}”)
    print(f” parsed calls : {len(t0.calls)} (declared {t0.declared_calls})”)
    print(f” observations : {t0.n_observations} think blocks: {t0.n_think}”)
    if t0.calls:
    print(f” sample call : {json.dumps(t0.calls[0], ensure_ascii=False)[:200]}”)
    agree = sum(len(t.calls) == t.declared_calls for t in TRAJ)
    print(f” parser vs ‘number of tool calls’: {agree}/{len(TRAJ)} exact match”)
    calls_per = [len(t.calls) for t in TRAJ]
    depth_per = [t.depth for t in TRAJ]
    chars_per = [sum(len(m[“content”]) for m in t.messages) for t in TRAJ]
    name_freq = Counter(n for t in TRAJ for n in t.tool_names)
    argkey_freq = defaultdict(Counter)
    for t in TRAJ:
    for c in t.calls:
    args = c.get(“arguments”, {})
    if isinstance(args, dict):
    for k in args: argkey_freq[c.get(“name”, “?”)][k] += 1
    def q(xs, p):
    xs = sorted(xs); return xs[min(len(xs) – 1, int(p * len(xs)))]
    print(“\n[3] corpus statistics”)
    print(f” tool calls / traj : mean {stats.mean(calls_per):.1f} p50 {q(calls_per,.5)} ”
    f”p90 {q(calls_per,.9)} max {max(calls_per)}”)
    print(f” messages / traj : mean {stats.mean(depth_per):.1f} p90 {q(depth_per,.9)} max {max(depth_per)}”)
    print(f” chars / traj : mean {stats.mean(chars_per):,.0f} p90 {q(chars_per,.9):,}”)
    print(f” tool distribution : {dict(name_freq)}”)
    for k, v in argkey_freq.items():
    print(f” {k:<24} arg keys -> {dict(v.most_common(6))}”)
    tot = sum(chars_per); top = sum(sorted(chars_per)[-max(1, len(chars_per)//10):])
    print(f” top-10% longest trajectories hold {100*top/tot:.1f}% of all characters”)
    fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(15, 3.6))
    ax[0].hist(calls_per, bins=40); ax[0].set_yscale(“log”); ax[0].set_title(“tool calls / trajectory”)
    ax[1].hist(depth_per, bins=40); ax[1].set_yscale(“log”); ax[1].set_title(“messages / trajectory”)
    ax[2].bar(list(name_freq), list(name_freq.values())); ax[2].set_title(“tool usage”); ax[2].tick_params(axis=”x”, rotation=20)
    plt.tight_layout(); plt.show()

    We define nesting-safe utilities for extracting JSON tool calls, reasoning blocks, observations, and embedded tool schemas from each conversation. We convert every raw dataset row into a structured trajectory object and verify that the parsed tool-call counts match the values declared by the dataset. We then calculate corpus-level statistics and visualize the distributions of tool calls, message depth, trajectory size, and tool usage frequency.

    QWEN3_TOOLS_TMPL = (
    “You are provided with function signatures within <tools></tools> XML tags:\n<tools>\n”
    “{lines}\n</tools>\n\nFor each function call, return a json object with function name ”
    “and arguments within <tool_call></tool_call> XML tags:\n<tool_call>\n”
    ‘{{“name”: <function-name>, “arguments”: <args-json-object>}}\n</tool_call>’
    )
    def extract_tools(t: Trajectory) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    “””message-embedded schemas -> {‘messages’: […], ‘tools’: […]}”””
    msgs = [dict(m) for m in t.messages]
    if msgs and msgs[0][“role”] == “system”:
    msgs[0][“content”] = t.system_core
    return {“messages”: msgs, “tools”: t.tools,
    “question”: t.question, “answer”: t.answer}
    def render_tools(rec: Dict[str, Any]) -> List[Dict[str, str]]:
    “””inverse: structured tools -> schemas re-embedded in the system message”””
    msgs = [dict(m) for m in rec[“messages”]]
    if rec[“tools”] and msgs and msgs[0][“role”] == “system”:
    lines = “\n”.join(json.dumps(x, ensure_ascii=False) for x in rec[“tools”])
    msgs[0][“content”] = msgs[0][“content”] + QWEN3_TOOLS_TMPL.format(lines=lines)
    return msgs
    _rt = render_tools(extract_tools(t0))
    exact = _rt[0][“content”] == t0.messages[0][“content”]
    print(f”\n[4] extract->render byte-exact: {exact}”)
    if not exact:
    print(” template drift detected -> using verbatim tools_suffix for render()”)
    a, b = t0.messages[0][“content”], _rt[0][“content”]
    i = next((i for i in range(min(len(a), len(b))) if a[i] != b[i]), min(len(a), len(b)))
    print(f” first divergence @{i}: {a[i:i+70]!r} vs {b[i:i+70]!r}”)
    tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(CFG[“MODEL_ID”])
    if tok.pad_token is None:
    tok.pad_token = tok.eos_token
    IM_START, IM_END, NL = “<|im_start|>”, “<|im_end|>”, “\n”
    def render_and_mask(t: Trajectory, max_len: int, policy: str):
    “””Manual ChatML so we control masking token-exactly.
    WHY NOT apply_chat_template(): Qwen3’s template deletes <think>…</think>
    from every assistant turn except the last. On this dataset that silently
    destroys most of the reasoning supervision you are paying to train on.
    “””
    ids, labels = [], []
    for m in t.messages:
    head = tok(f”{IM_START}{m[‘role’]}{NL}”, add_special_tokens=False).input_ids
    body = tok(m[“content”], add_special_tokens=False).input_ids
    tail = tok(f”{IM_END}{NL}”, add_special_tokens=False).input_ids
    seg = head + body + tail
    if m[“role”] == “assistant”:
    lab = [-100] * len(head) + body + tail
    else:
    lab = [-100] * len(seg)
    ids += seg; labels += lab
    if len(ids) > max_len:
    if policy == “drop”:
    return None
    ids, labels = ids[:max_len], labels[:max_len]
    if all(l == -100 for l in labels):
    return None
    return {“input_ids”: ids, “labels”: labels}
    _probe = [{“role”: “system”, “content”: “S”}, {“role”: “user”, “content”: “U”},
    {“role”: “assistant”, “content”: “A”}]
    _mine = “”.join(f”{IM_START}{m[‘role’]}{NL}{m[‘content’]}{IM_END}{NL}” for m in _probe)
    _theirs = tok.apply_chat_template(_probe, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=False)
    print(f”\n[5] manual ChatML == chat_template on tool-free probe: {_mine == _theirs}”)
    if _mine != _theirs:
    print(f” mine : {_mine!r}\n theirs: {_theirs!r} (informational only)”)
    ENC = [e for e in (render_and_mask(t, CFG[“MAX_SEQ_LEN”], CFG[“LENGTH_POLICY”]) for t in TRAJ) if e]
    sup = [sum(1 for x in e[“labels”] if x != -100) / len(e[“labels”]) for e in ENC]
    print(f” encoded {len(ENC)}/{len(TRAJ)} examples”)
    print(f” supervised-token ratio: mean {stats.mean(sup):.3f} p10 {q(sup,.1):.3f} p90 {q(sup,.9):.3f}”)
    over = sum(1 for t in TRAJ if sum(len(tok(m[‘content’], add_special_tokens=False).input_ids)
    for m in t.messages[:3]) > CFG[“MAX_SEQ_LEN”])
    print(f” trajectories whose first 3 msgs alone exceed MAX_SEQ_LEN: {over}”)
    SPLIT = len(ENC) – min(CFG[“N_EVAL”], len(ENC)//5)
    TRAIN_ENC, EVAL_TRAJ = ENC[:SPLIT], TRAJ[SPLIT:]
    class SFTSet(torch.utils.data.Dataset):
    def __init__(self, rows): self.rows = rows
    def __len__(self): return len(self.rows)
    def __getitem__(self, i): return self.rows[i]
    def collate(batch):
    L = max(len(b[“input_ids”]) for b in batch)
    pad = tok.pad_token_id
    return {
    “input_ids”: torch.tensor([b[“input_ids”] + [pad]*(L-len(b[“input_ids”])) for b in batch]),
    “labels”: torch.tensor([b[“labels”] + [-100]*(L-len(b[“labels”])) for b in batch]),
    “attention_mask”: torch.tensor([[1]*len(b[“input_ids”]) + [0]*(L-len(b[“input_ids”])) for b in batch]),
    }
    loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(SFTSet(TRAIN_ENC), batch_size=1, shuffle=True, collate_fn=collate)
    print(f”\n[6] train={len(TRAIN_ENC)} eval_trajectories={len(EVAL_TRAJ)}”)

    We extract embedded tool definitions into a structured format and reconstruct them to test whether the conversion preserves the original system message. We manually render each trajectory in ChatML format to retain all reasoning content and apply loss only to assistant-generated tokens. We also tokenize the examples, enforce the selected sequence-length policy, create the training and evaluation split, and prepare a padded PyTorch DataLoader.

    ledger
    def build_probes(trajs, n):
    “””Teacher-forced probes: cut the trajectory right before an assistant turn
    that issues a tool call; the gold label is that call.”””
    probes = []
    for t in trajs:
    for i, m in enumerate(t.messages):
    if m[“role”] != “assistant”:
    continue
    gold = parse_tool_calls(m[“content”])
    if not gold:
    continue
    prefix = “”.join(f”{IM_START}x[‘role’]{NL}” for x in [])
    prefix = “”.join(f”{IM_START}{p[‘role’]}{NL}{p[‘content’]}{IM_END}{NL}”
    for p in t.messages[:i]) + f”{IM_START}assistant{NL}”
    if len(tok(prefix, add_special_tokens=False).input_ids) > CFG[“MAX_SEQ_LEN”] – 160:
    continue
    probes.append({“prefix”: prefix, “gold”: gold[0]})
    break
    if len(probes) >= n:
    break
    return probes
    @torch.no_grad()
    def eval_tool_calls(model, probes, tag):
    model.eval()
    name_hit = arg_f1 = parsed = 0
    for p in probes:
    enc = tok(p[“prefix”], return_tensors=”pt”, add_special_tokens=False).to(model.device)
    out = model.generate(**enc, max_new_tokens=160, do_sample=False,
    pad_token_id=tok.pad_token_id)
    gen = tok.decode(out[0][enc.input_ids.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)
    pred = (parse_tool_calls(gen) or iter_json_objects(gen, limit=1) or [None])[0]
    if not isinstance(pred, dict):
    continue
    parsed += 1
    g = p[“gold”]
    name_hit += int(pred.get(“name”) == g.get(“name”))
    pk = set((pred.get(“arguments”) or {}).keys()) if isinstance(pred.get(“arguments”), dict) else set()
    gk = set((g.get(“arguments”) or {}).keys()) if isinstance(g.get(“arguments”), dict) else set()
    if pk or gk:
    inter = len(pk & gk)
    arg_f1 += 0.0 if inter == 0 else 2*inter/(len(pk)+len(gk))
    n = max(1, len(probes))
    print(f” [{tag}] parseable {parsed}/{n} | tool-name acc {name_hit/n:.3f} | arg-key F1 {arg_f1/n:.3f}”)
    return dict(parsed=parsed/n, name_acc=name_hit/n, arg_f1=arg_f1/n)
    PROBES = build_probes(EVAL_TRAJ, CFG[“N_EVAL_PROBES”])
    print(f” built {len(PROBES)} teacher-forced probes”)
    results = {}
    if CFG[“RUN_TRAINING”]:
    from peft import LoraConfig, get_peft_model
    dtype = torch.bfloat16 if BF16 else torch.float32
    model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    CFG[“MODEL_ID”], torch_dtype=dtype, attn_implementation=”sdpa”).to(DEV)
    model.config.use_cache = False
    model.gradient_checkpointing_enable()
    model.enable_input_require_grads()
    if CFG[“RUN_EVAL”] and PROBES and DEV == “cuda”:
    print(“\n[8] baseline eval”)
    results[“before”] = eval_tool_calls(model, PROBES, “base”)
    model = get_peft_model(model, LoraConfig(
    r=CFG[“LORA_R”], lora_alpha=2*CFG[“LORA_R”], lora_dropout=0.05,
    bias=”none”, task_type=”CAUSAL_LM”,
    model.print_trainable_parameters()
    opt = torch.optim.AdamW([p for p in model.parameters() if p.requires_grad],
    lr=CFG[“LR”], weight_decay=0.0, betas=(0.9, 0.95))
    sched = get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup(opt, 5, CFG[“MAX_STEPS”])
    scaler = torch.amp.GradScaler(“cuda”, enabled=(DEV == “cuda” and not BF16))
    amp_dt = torch.bfloat16 if BF16 else torch.float16
    print(f”\n[7] training {CFG[‘MAX_STEPS’]} steps ”
    f”(bs1 x accum{CFG[‘GRAD_ACCUM’]} = {CFG[‘GRAD_ACCUM’]} traj/step)”)
    model.train(); step = 0; run = None; it = iter(loader)
    while step < CFG[“MAX_STEPS”]:
    opt.zero_grad(set_to_none=True); acc = 0.0
    for _ in range(CFG[“GRAD_ACCUM”]):
    try: batch = next(it)
    except StopIteration:
    it = iter(loader); batch = next(it)
    batch = {k: v.to(DEV) for k, v in batch.items()}
    with torch.autocast(DEV, dtype=amp_dt, enabled=(DEV == “cuda”)):
    loss = model(**batch).loss / CFG[“GRAD_ACCUM”]
    scaler.scale(loss).backward() if scaler.is_enabled() else loss.backward()
    acc += loss.item()
    if scaler.is_enabled():
    scaler.unscale_(opt)
    (scaler.step(opt), scaler.update()) if scaler.is_enabled() else opt.step()
    sched.step(); step += 1
    run = acc if run is None else 0.9*run + 0.1*acc
    if step % 5 == 0 or step == 1:
    print(f” step {step:>3}/{CFG[‘MAX_STEPS’]} loss {acc:.4f} ema {run:.4f} ”
    f”lr {sched.get_last_lr()[0]:.2e} ppl {math.exp(min(20, acc)):.1f}”)
    model.save_pretrained(f”{CFG[‘OUT_DIR’]}/lora_adapter”); tok.save_pretrained(f”{CFG[‘OUT_DIR’]}/lora_adapter”)
    print(f” adapter -> {CFG[‘OUT_DIR’]}/lora_adapter”)
    if CFG[“RUN_EVAL”] and PROBES and DEV == “cuda”:
    print(“\n[8] post-training eval”)
    model.config.use_cache = True
    results[“after”] = eval_tool_calls(model, PROBES, “lora”)
    model.config.use_cache = False
    if “before” in results and “after” in results:
    print(“\n delta:”, {k: round(results[‘after’][k] – results[‘before’][k], 3)
    for k in results[‘after’]})
    print(” (30 steps on ~350 trajectories is a smoke test, not a result — ”
    “expect noise, and scale N_STREAM/MAX_STEPS for anything real.)”)

    We build teacher-forced evaluation probes by cutting trajectories immediately before assistant turns that contain tool calls. We load Qwen3-0.6B, measure its baseline tool-call performance, attach LoRA adapters, and fine-tune the model using gradient accumulation, mixed precision, checkpointing, clipping, and cosine learning-rate scheduling. We then evaluate the adapted model, compare its metrics with the baseline, and save the trained LoRA adapter and tokenizer.

    struct_path = f”{CFG[‘OUT_DIR’]}/aquila_{CFG[‘LANG’]}_structured_tools.jsonl”
    with open(struct_path, “w”, encoding=”utf-8″) as f:
    for t in TRAJ:
    f.write(json.dumps(extract_tools(t), ensure_ascii=False) + “\n”)
    stats_path = f”{CFG[‘OUT_DIR’]}/corpus_stats.json”
    with open(stats_path, “w”) as f:
    json.dump({“n”: len(TRAJ), “tool_freq”: dict(name_freq),
    “calls_mean”: stats.mean(calls_per), “calls_max”: max(calls_per),
    “depth_p90”: q(depth_per, .9), “encoded”: len(ENC),
    “supervised_ratio_mean”: stats.mean(sup), “eval”: results}, f, indent=2)
    print(f”\n[9] wrote:\n {struct_path}\n {stats_path}”)
    print(“done.”)

    We export every parsed trajectory as a structured JSONL record containing messages, tool schemas, questions, and answers. We also save a JSON report containing corpus size, tool frequencies, trajectory statistics, supervised-token ratios, and available evaluation results. We finish the workflow with reusable dataset artifacts, analytical outputs, and model files stored in the configured output directory.

    In conclusion, we completed a practical pipeline for analyzing, transforming, fine-tuning, and evaluating complex tool-use trajectories from the XYZ-Aquila-SFT dataset. We preserved the original conversational structure, applied token-level supervision only to assistant responses, and used LoRA to adapt Qwen3-0.6B efficiently on a Colab-compatible GPU. We also compared baseline and post-training tool-call performance through teacher-forced evaluation and exported reusable structured records, model adapters, and analytical statistics. This workflow gives us a strong foundation for scaling tool-aware supervised fine-tuning, testing alternative sequence-length policies, and training more capable agentic language models.

    Check out the FULL CODES here. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.

    Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us

    Sana Hassan, a consulting intern at Marktechpost and dual-degree student at IIT Madras, is passionate about applying technology and AI to address real-world challenges. With a keen interest in solving practical problems, he brings a fresh perspective to the intersection of AI and real-life solutions.



    Source link

    quillbot
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Okta targets AI agent token costs with MCP scoping

    August 14, 2026

    AllenAI Open Instruct Tulu 3 Post-Training with SFT, DPO, RLVR, GRPO, and Verifier-Based Evaluation

    August 13, 2026

    With a feel for physics, AI models simulate a wider range of real-world scenarios | MIT News

    August 12, 2026

    OpenAI launches GPT-5.6-Cyber with reduced refusals, 95% completion on advanced cybersecurity tasks

    August 11, 2026

    Stanford Evo 2 AI model generates phages against E. coli

    August 10, 2026

    Meet Shepherd: An Open-Source Python Substrate That Lets Meta-Agents Fork, Replay, and Revert Any Agent Run

    August 9, 2026
    murf
    Latest Posts

    Only Ways to Make Money with Claude, ChatGPT & Gemini in 2026 | EARN Rs.5,000/Day

    August 16, 2026

    AI Basics for Beginners: How Artificial Intelligence Really Works

    August 16, 2026

    How to Make Animated Explainer Videos with AI (Full Guide)

    August 16, 2026

    Bitcoin Mining Stocks Rise as Industry Chases AI Infrastructure

    August 16, 2026

    Bitcoin Could Bottom in October, Altcoins Are ‘Basically Dead,’ Swan CEO Says

    August 15, 2026
    aistudios
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights

    Is Dogecoin About to Go Parabolic? These DOGE Signals Suggest So

    August 16, 2026

    AVAX Price Prediction: Bears Own This Chart — $5.98 Is the Next Stop

    August 16, 2026
    murf
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 CloudTechReport.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    bitcoin
    Bitcoin (BTC) $ 63,014.00
    ethereum
    Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,879.20
    tether
    Tether (USDT) $ 0.999183
    bnb
    BNB (BNB) $ 607.01
    usd-coin
    USDC (USDC) $ 0.999647
    xrp
    XRP (XRP) $ 1.00
    solana
    Solana (SOL) $ 75.39
    tron
    TRON (TRX) $ 0.330892
    figure-heloc
    Figure Heloc (FIGR_HELOC) $ 1.00
    staked-ether
    Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,265.05